Follow us on Twitter!
Blog Header Logo
DG&A's Transportation Consulting Blog
Posted by on in Shipper-Carrier Collaboration
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 6725
  • 0 Comments
  • Print

Does your Company Need a Motor Carrier Agreement to Manage its Freight Transportation?

 

b2ap3_thumbnail_dreamstime_xl_64569399.jpg

Motor carrier agreements or contracts are documents signed between shippers and carriers that set out the parameters and processes under which two or more companies work together to provide freight transportation services. These documents, often prepared by lawyers (with input from freight management professionals), set out a range of service expectations and freight rates that define the relationship between the parties. While freight agreements have come into widespread use, the question is if and when these documents are necessary?

One could argue that if two or more parties are operating in good faith, do they need a legal document to circumscribe the nature of their relationship? If shippers and carriers are supposed to work together as partners in an open and trusting manner, does a formal, written agreement get in the way of a business partnership arrangement? Does it inhibit open and honest communication?

Do motor carrier agreements create a rigid framework that reduces flexibility? Are they detrimental to the sometime unpredictable and fluid nature of freight transportation? Does a formal agreement make it more difficult for a shipper to obtain additional equipment or after hour’s service? Do they place carriers with a limited set of equipment into a straight-jacket? Does the fear of punishment or service failure force a carrier to provide equipment and service to one client (that has a contract) at the expense of another client (that doesn’t have one)?

Some of these issues are valid concerns. The freight business is fast-moving. Shippers and carriers need to work together in a trusting relationship and adapt quickly and effectively to changing situations.

Freight agreements are not universally necessary for every shipper-carrier relationship. For companies with a small freight spend (less than $2 million on an annual basis), contracts are probably unnecessary unless all of the freight moves with one mode (i.e. small parcel) and with one carrier. For shippers who work in markets where there are limited choices, contracts are likely of limited value. Similarly, for shippers with multi-million dollar freight expenditures, there are likely niche carriers that service certain remote or hard to reach markets. On an annual basis, these costs may be less than $500,000 per year. There is likely no need for freight agreements to manage these carriers. In these instances, a rate agreement and transit schedule will likely suffice.

However, for shippers who spend 5, 10 or 50 million dollars (or more) on freight transportation, carrier contracts can be very beneficial. Here is the rationale.

A good motor carrier agreement addresses a range of important items. A well written contract will specify the types of licenses and permits that the motor carrier must have to perform work for the shipper. It lays out the quality of equipment and drivers that the carrier must employ to transport the shipper’s freight. It also details the services to be performed and how performance will be measured. It goes on to describe the “progressive discipline” process that will be in place, including timelines for corrective action, to ensure acceptable levels of performance are maintained over time. The agreement outlines the level of insurance required to protect the goods of the shipper and describes the process for damage or loss claims. It includes the rates and surcharges to be applied and the formula for rate increases in subsequent years. The transit schedule is usually attached as an addendum.

In other words, a good motor carrier agreement takes away a level of risk and uncertainty that can exist for both parties. It provides a detailed blueprint of all of the key elements of a successful shipper- carrier relationship over a multi-year period. Rather than restricting the nature of the relationship, a good agreement promotes a long term partnership. Check out the next blog where the components of a comprehensive, quality agreement are outlined in detail.

 

To stay up to date on Best Practices in Freight Management, follow me on Twitter @DanGoodwill, join the Freight Management Best Practices group on and subscribe to Dan’s Transportation Newspaper (http://paper.li/DanGoodwill/1342211466).

0

Comments

  • No comments made yet. Be the first to submit a comment

Leave your comment

Guest Friday, 19 April 2024

Most Recent Posts

Search


Tag Cloud

APL professional drivers Social Media energy efficiency technology Training New Hires FMCSA FuelQuest freight transportation Amazon freight forwarders Education Comey Montreal Canadiens future of freight industry capacity shortage NS digital freight matching Transcom Fleet Leasing Packaging 3PL EBOR Whole Foods Finance and Transportation dynamic pricing transportation audit Government LTL peak season Facebook shipping e-commerce Toronto Maple Leafs Climate Change Stephen Harper Trade Vision Freight Rates Hockey China Uber Freight shipper-carrier collaboration dark stores 3PLTL Retail Sales Strategy ELD Scott Monty Rail recession freight bid Railway Association of Canada Celadon FCPC 360ideaspace Infrastructure Loblaw TMP Worldwide Hudsons Bay Company USA Truck Leadership trade NAFTA derailments employee termination Life Lessons Spanx Consulting FMS economic forecasts for 2012 Tariffs selling trucking companies Canadian economy freight marketplace buying trucking companies Success failure entrepreneur Driver Shortage CSA customer engagement business start-up Failure Freight contracts small business Shipper Entrepreneur Covid-19 pipelines dimensional pricing fuel surcharge US Housing Market Business Transformation Strategy transportation news intermodal CN Rail Rotman School of Business Horizontal Supply Chain Collaboration Werner Canada's global strategy Freight Management Reshoring LinkedIn Transloading freight payment freight audit robotics driverless Dedicated Trucking Outsourcing Sales truck driver freight costs Toronto Inbound Transportation Politics shipper-carrier roundtable CSX business security Habs computer security TMS automation Doug Davis Canada 2012 Transportation Business Strategies. Jugaad the future of transportation US Economy Canada-U.S. trade agreement YRC small parcel Freight Capacity driver shortages Training New York Times Freight Recession asset management $75000 bond financial management bulk shipping Truckload Blockchain NCC BNSF capacity shortages UP Accessorial Charges General Motors Grocery Rate per Mile KCS Transport Capital Partners (TCP) Freight Matching laptop Distribution Dan Goodwill Global Transportation Hub drones Canadian freight market Canadian Transportation & Logistics Broker ProMiles Warehousing Masters in Logistics Associates Colilers International trucking company acquisitions Derek Singleton Doug Nix BlueGrace Logistics 2014 freight forecast carrier conference David Tuttle Adrian Gonzalez cars ShipMax truck capacity CP Rail LCV's Freight Carriers Association of Canada mentoring Muhammad Ali home delivery Driving for Profit University of Tennessee Load broker Map-21 Canadian Protests Dedicated Contract Carriage freight RFP Fire Phone freight transportation in 2011 Keystone Pipeline Online grocery shopping online shopping Business skills home delibery autos Trucker Protest Crisis management US Manufacturing natural disasters coaching Transportation service JB Hunt US Election freight cost savings Digital Freight Networks Donald Trump Success Wal-Mart US Auto Sales Schneider Logistics Twitter TransForce Transplace CRM Value Proposition IANA tanker cars marketing Harper Davos speech shipper-carrier contracts NMFC broker security RFP risk management Surety bond USMCA computer protection freight payment transportation newspaper Social Media in Transportation Right Shoring supply chain management Leafs Crude Oil by Rail Omni Channel rail safety President Obama consumer centric YRCW MPG 2014 economic forecast cheap oil CN driver pay Job satisfaction Tracy Matura 2015 Economic Forecast Global experience Ferromex freight agreements Business Development Geopolitics Coronavirus Canadian truckers Carriers FCA Transportation Buying Trends Survey shipping wine Digitization Transportation Swift autonomous vehicles Otto Trucking Conway freight transportation conference Career Advice Blogging Freight freight audit truck drivers routing guide MBA Management 2013 Economic Forecast Emergent Strategy computer Search engine optimization Freight Shuttle System Electric Vehicles Bobby Harris Microsoft Justice network optimization freight rate increases Canada U.S. trade last mile delivery driver cyber security freight broker Anti-Vax Deferred Packaging hiring process 2014 freight volumes Sales Management Yield Improvement Sales Trump Business Strategy Impeachment broker bonds CSA scores CITA Shipper Pulse Survey Software Advice solutions provider Regina Load Boards Retail transportation economy Cleveland Cavaliers Sales Training economic outlook

Blog Archives

April
March
February
December
October
September
August
June
May
April
March
January