Follow us on Twitter!
Blog Header Logo
DG&A's Transportation Consulting Blog
Posted by on in Freight Bids
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 2301
  • 0 Comments
  • Print

Get your “House in Order” Before Conducting a Freight Bid

 

b2ap3_thumbnail_dreamstime_xl_49290215.jpg

One of the most frequent complaints I hear from carriers, in person, on social media, or at conferences, is about the number and quality of freight bids that they receive. Carriers complain about the poor quality of the data, the number of carriers in the bid, and about the lack of professionalism in the bid process. They also assert that if the shipper would just meet with them face to face, rather than through a bid process, the result would be more successful for both parties and would take a lot less time, money and effort.

My company has designed and executed many successful bids over the past fourteen years. We have learned that for many shippers, success comes from getting “your house in order” before executing the bid. This is what is involved.

Many shippers have been moving the same freight, to the same consignees, using the same processes, for several years. In their haste to put their freight out for bid, they overlook certain aspects of their business.

A company's product portfolio evolves over time.  New products are introduced as old ones are retired. Miniaturization and packaging changes can have significant impacts on freight densities, and as a by-product, freight rates.  It is essential for shippers to obtain precise calculations of updated product densities before launching a bid exercise.

Businesses change over time. New divisions are added while others may be closed or sold. This may alter freight flows.  Some companies overlook the opportunity to merge their freight with their new sister or acquired divisions to improve their negotiating leverage. In other cases, new pool or consolidation points may evolve.

We sometimes find companies that experience a deterioration in their business volumes. Poor economic or competitive conditions may reduce shipping volumes and leverage. This can necessitate combining volumes with competitive shippers, forming industry associations or taking other creative approaches to make their freight more attractive to carriers.

Shippers should also look at their order fulfillment processes and cycle times. Some consignees may be able to provide more lead time on their orders if you ask them. This can allow for combining daily LTL orders into larger shipment sizes and moving them on designated days.

In other cases, intermodal transportation, in some areas, may be an effective option to over the road service, at a significant savings.  For certain Canadian-based companies, they may be able to arrange direct shipping of their products from their US vendors to their Canadian consignees, by-passing their Canadian warehouses in some instances, and reducing cross-docking, re-handling, and line haul costs.

It is critical to identify and implement these efficiencies before conducting a bid. These operational changes will translate into even bigger savings after the bid has been conducted. If necessary, delay the launch of the bid until these changes are made. Keep in mind that your carriers’ rates are tied to freight volumes on specific corridors. If you make these changes after the bid, you run the risk that the carriers will come back and ask for a renegotiation of the rates.

Shippers also need to get their data in order before conducting bid. It is essential that the carriers in the bid be supplied with accurate data upon which they can base their rates. The data should be cleansed to remove errors in weights; the volumes in certain lanes should be corrected to reflect new customers added during the year and the loss of some old ones.

Two other areas to look at are production and inventory management processes. For some shippers, these may be delicate issues to raise with their supply chain partners. Nevertheless, if there are problems with production processes such that the company is required to make excessive use of expedited services, or if cramped warehouses force the company to move suboptimal shipment sizes, these translate into higher than necessary freight costs. Again, these items should be addressed, if possible, before executing the bid.

By making ongoing changes to a company’s supply chain, this ensures that the business is operating as efficiently as possible. By combining these changes with a well organized FRP process, shippers can maximize their savings. For more information on how to conduct a professional freight bid, check out my series of blogs on this topic (http://www.dantranscon.com/index.php/blog/entry/freight-bid-tip-1-obtain-buy-in-and-participation-from-the-operating-divisions ).

 

To stay up to date on Best Practices in Freight Management, follow me on Twitter @DanGoodwill, join the Freight Management Best Practices group on LinkedIn and subscribe to Dan’s Transportation Newspaper (http://paper.li/DanGoodwill/1342211466).

0

Comments

  • No comments made yet. Be the first to submit a comment

Leave your comment

Guest Thursday, 28 March 2024

Most Recent Posts

Search


Tag Cloud

Management Load Boards Transplace selling trucking companies US Election FCPC Harper Davos speech freight broker freight payment freight audit autonomous vehicles cheap oil Twitter Impeachment Schneider Logistics Transportation Buying Trends Survey IANA Global experience computer protection broker security CSA Driving for Profit economic forecasts for 2012 Transportation service trade Canadian Transportation & Logistics Social Media in Transportation Training computer security Government FCA customer engagement Hockey Facebook MPG Training New Hires Covid-19 peak season Search engine optimization Sales Strategy derailments marketing UP MBA financial management Emergent Strategy Digitization Werner NCC Career Advice US Economy New York Times Failure Value Proposition Freight contracts ELD dimensional pricing risk management fuel surcharge Doug Nix Wal-Mart freight costs Scott Monty shipper-carrier contracts the future of transportation Muhammad Ali Dedicated Trucking Warehousing freight bid intermodal Freight Management Donald Trump Uber Freight laptop US Auto Sales YRCW Map-21 TMP Worldwide autos TMS Blogging consumer centric Accessorial Charges capacity shortage freight forwarders solutions provider USA Truck Canada-U.S. trade agreement YRC CSA scores truck capacity Ferromex China LTL KCS driverless mentoring Adrian Gonzalez Toronto Business Development TransForce Software Advice 2014 economic forecast economy Anti-Vax Surety bond future of freight industry Outsourcing Sales 3PL Dedicated Contract Carriage driver shortages home delivery Reshoring $75000 bond Deferred Packaging Canadian freight market Transloading truck driver US Housing Market Keystone Pipeline freight audit digital freight matching Amazon ShipMax Social Media online shopping freight transportation conference BlueGrace Logistics Transcom Fleet Leasing Microsoft Success failure entrepreneur Sales Training Coronavirus freight cost savings Retail Canada's global strategy Politics BNSF driver Swift JB Hunt 2014 freight volumes Rate per Mile FMCSA Conway Climate Change US Manufacturing professional drivers bulk shipping computer broker bonds carrier conference Leadership Freight Sales Management Stephen Harper Trade Vision Right Shoring 2015 Economic Forecast shipping wine energy efficiency 3PLTL Business skills business start-up transportation newspaper ProMiles truck drivers network optimization small business Electric Vehicles Job satisfaction freight rate increases Otto Blockchain tanker cars Rotman School of Business Trucker Protest University of Tennessee FMS Business Strategy Transportation 2014 freight forecast Whole Foods Omni Channel Masters in Logistics Tracy Matura cars Crisis management business security freight marketplace last mile delivery dynamic pricing Colilers International freight payment Trucking Carriers Success 360ideaspace asset management Associates Education Canadian Protests Freight Rates Crude Oil by Rail capacity shortages Broker Freight Shuttle System Truckload recession Sales Railway Association of Canada Canada U.S. trade Loblaw Rail FuelQuest CP Rail Online grocery shopping pipelines Freight Recession Grocery Toronto Maple Leafs shipper-carrier collaboration shipper-carrier roundtable Digital Freight Networks employee termination Packaging RFP General Motors Bobby Harris Spanx Comey Yield Improvement Inbound Transportation Cleveland Cavaliers Geopolitics driver pay transportation news trucking company acquisitions Infrastructure dark stores CN cyber security Celadon CSX automation freight transportation in 2011 technology small parcel e-commerce David Tuttle supply chain management Entrepreneur Finance and Transportation Retail transportation Life Lessons shipping Trump Freight Capacity CN Rail transportation audit freight RFP 2013 Economic Forecast NMFC routing guide Regina home delibery freight agreements hiring process Global Transportation Hub rail safety President Obama Fire Phone Justice Canada USMCA Canadian economy EBOR 2012 Transportation Business Strategies. Jugaad Shipper Horizontal Supply Chain Collaboration Derek Singleton Habs CITA Shipper Pulse Survey APL LCV's freight transportation natural disasters Tariffs Doug Davis Freight Matching Hudsons Bay Company Distribution NS Dan Goodwill economic outlook LinkedIn Transport Capital Partners (TCP) Canadian truckers Driver Shortage Consulting robotics drones Load broker Leafs Montreal Canadiens coaching CRM Business Transformation Strategy Freight Carriers Association of Canada NAFTA buying trucking companies

Blog Archives

March
February
December
October
September
August
June
May
April
March
January