Follow us on Twitter!
Blog Header Logo
DG&A's Transportation Consulting Blog
Posted by on in Truckload Transportation
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 15869
  • 0 Comments
  • Print

Smaller Carriers are “Feeling the Heat” in the Truckload Market

Dr. Richard Mikes, Managing Partner of Transport Capital Partners (TCP) recently spoke on the subject of the Truckload Market on a conference call hosted by Stifel Nicolaus & Company.  Here are some excerpts from the survey results presented by Mr. Mikes. 

“The freight rate market as a whole started switching directions about a year ago. In other words, the share of the carriers reporting that their freight rates are increasing has just dropped from a high of about 80% to a low of about 10% this past month. Accordingly, we would classify rates as being stuck in neutral. Three quarters of the firms are now reporting that rates have remained the same, certainly a massive change from a year ago.”

The survey segmented carriers into two groups, those under $25 million and those over $25 million in revenue.  “Interestingly, the … (data) . . .  presents “a real divergence in rate changes. Though both large and small carriers are largely keeping rates the same, there is a spattering of smaller carriers reporting rate decreases of 5%, 10%, or even 15%. Those numbers total only 18%, but they still tell the story. The pressure is on the smaller carriers.”

The FTR survey asked carriers to indicate their expectations with respect to volume.  “After a nice bounce this quarter, about 52% of carriers expect volumes to increase over the next 12 months and a similar number expect them to remain the same. Very few say volumes will actually decrease.

The survey then looked at what carriers plan to do with respect to adding capacity in this predicted environment. “The number of carriers saying they will not add capacity remained largely constant with a temporary spike around the . . . (U.S.) . . . election. It jumped up to almost 50% around election time. Those were the feelings in the moment.

If we again split the data by the size of carrier . . .  we see the larger carriers have a larger percentage looking to add any sort of capacity. However, the smaller carriers who do plan on adding capacity have more ambitious plans than the larger ones. It is hard to pick up any trends beyond that. On a related note, the ATA says that since December 2007, both large and small fleet tractor counts are flat. In other words, capacity has not changed from the beginning of the recession. We are down from the peak capacity by 15%-20% depending on what metric you choose.”

Mr. Mikes then addressed the question of whether or not the carriers plan on adding the capacity (if they do). “There has been a steady increase in the use of financed or leased equipment as the means of adding capacity over the last two to three years. At the same time, the use of independent contractors has trended downward for the last two years, despite an increase in the most recent survey. What we hear from carriers is that drivers are scarce and independent contractors are even scarcer. As a result, there is a rebirth in trying to offer financing programs, or really anything to get a person interested in buying a tractor and leasing it to a carrier. This has added to the independent contractor method of adding capacity trickling down. If you look at the various numbers for independent contractors and what has happened to them, they were probably the hardest hit during the major recession and, accordingly, parked their trucks. A lot of those trucks hit the auction market after repossession.”

One of the other things that the survey tries to track is how carriers are marketing their business, acquiring loads, and how much they depend upon the spot market.  “We asked this at different times over the last three years and noticed that the amount firms relying on the spot market is going up constantly. This means there is less reliance on brokers by the entire industry, which meshes with what we are hearing from the carriers.”

The survey inquired into the use of brokers.  “We survey in the first and third quarters because the first quarter of every year is low freight time and is the time when carriers tend to look for freight from brokers. It is interesting that the numbers are about the same between 2012 and 2013.This is really the period of peak use and the numbers are about the same year over year. If we look at the ‘less use’ compared to ‘more use’ over time, our reporting base suggests that carriers are using less brokered loads than they had previously. That trend has held for every survey point since February 2011. Brokered freight accounts for less than 5% of volume for 50% of the carriers; in other words it truly is a spot-on spot-off market for a number of carriers.”

The survey segregated the responses by size and it shows the same general trend.  “Generally, carriers under $25 million are more reliant on brokers. Carriers under $25 million are clearly more dependent on loads from the spot market than the larger carriers are. Generally speaking, smaller carriers have a longer average length of haul compared to larger carriers. These smaller companies also do not have the same size of marketing departments that the larger carriers have nor as much freight in lanes. So they are, by nature, more dependent on brokers.

One of the big things on the horizon is electronic logging and the potential regulation requiring it. Mr. Mikes stated that “currently only some carriers use electronic logging, and no final date has been set for when you are going to be required to have elogs. There is also the question of, ‘Who will be required to have them?’  When we asked this question three quarters ago in May 2012, 44% of the carriers responding said that they had not utilized them yet but they were considering them. Today, that number is down to 32% and there has been a jump from 25% to 35% saying that all trucks use elogs. In other words, we have had a pretty fast transition to elogs and people tell us that elogs are helping them in many different ways, including driver management and compliance with CSA. Once again splitting the industry by size of carrier, carriers under $25 million in revenue are using elogs far less than their larger counterparts (12% versus 42% fully equipped). This is a big difference.”

The TCP survey examined what they call “voluntary sellers.”  Mr. Mikes indicated that “this question is slightly different, probing a carrier’s interest in selling the company in the next 18 months. Interest in selling was somewhat higher in 2011, but if you look at it year-over-year, we are at the same place we were a year ago. By size of carrier, the picture is unsurprisingly similar . . . and the conclusion is apparent, though not unexpected: smaller carriers are feeling more pressure.

In summary, the survey highlighted how smaller carriers are more dependent on long haul movements, are feeling more pressure to reduce rates, are more reliant on freight brokers for loads and are more interested in selling their companies than their larger competitors.  The small guys are feeling the heat.

Tagged in: Transportation
0

Comments

  • No comments made yet. Be the first to submit a comment

Leave your comment

Guest Friday, 29 March 2024

Most Recent Posts

Search


Tag Cloud

Software Advice Whole Foods Education technology Leadership 2012 Transportation Business Strategies. Jugaad Training Emergent Strategy 2013 Economic Forecast 2014 freight volumes Regina Social Media Leafs Electric Vehicles FCA home delibery Bobby Harris Business Development Amazon dark stores Rail capacity shortage cyber security transportation audit David Tuttle business security Swift drones Warehousing shipping FMCSA freight transportation Covid-19 tanker cars Yield Improvement Success the future of transportation Canada U.S. trade Transplace Celadon selling trucking companies driver trucking company acquisitions Business Strategy freight audit LTL Business Transformation Strategy Accessorial Charges Ferromex 360ideaspace Load Boards Masters in Logistics shipper-carrier contracts recession Failure automation Comey Hudsons Bay Company Justice professional drivers Canadian Protests shipper-carrier roundtable freight RFP Sales US Manufacturing Adrian Gonzalez employee termination Colilers International KCS Map-21 Entrepreneur truck drivers Toronto capacity shortages Transcom Fleet Leasing CITA Shipper Pulse Survey Microsoft peak season CRM economic forecasts for 2012 Carriers Omni Channel Freight Carriers Association of Canada Otto Keystone Pipeline Fire Phone dynamic pricing 3PL Spanx Freight Shuttle System 2014 economic forecast Geopolitics Transport Capital Partners (TCP) $75000 bond Canadian freight market freight transportation in 2011 risk management Cleveland Cavaliers Sales Strategy computer security Transportation Buying Trends Survey driverless Canada-U.S. trade agreement YRC buying trucking companies Canadian truckers US Economy freight transportation conference Schneider Logistics FMS APL freight payment NAFTA Habs Impeachment freight agreements Doug Davis EBOR Freight Matching Donald Trump Consulting freight cost savings US Auto Sales LinkedIn Management routing guide small parcel computer protection transportation news Freight Recession Crisis management Railway Association of Canada Success failure entrepreneur ShipMax marketing Training New Hires Digital Freight Networks Uber Freight Distribution Crude Oil by Rail CN solutions provider Transloading Stephen Harper Trade Vision Grocery FCPC fuel surcharge trade home delivery pipelines supply chain management Horizontal Supply Chain Collaboration economic outlook economy Government Outsourcing Sales Freight freight forwarders Coronavirus BlueGrace Logistics NMFC Facebook digital freight matching Truckload YRCW truck driver Trump cars RFP asset management bulk shipping broker security business start-up driver shortages MPG BNSF Loblaw Global Transportation Hub small business Right Shoring carrier conference natural disasters e-commerce freight broker Reshoring mentoring Muhammad Ali consumer centric Scott Monty driver pay Conway Shipper Freight Capacity Search engine optimization energy efficiency CSX cheap oil Driving for Profit Driver Shortage Transportation service Freight Management USMCA Broker autos MBA JB Hunt CSA network optimization Anti-Vax Rate per Mile dimensional pricing USA Truck US Housing Market shipper-carrier collaboration Canada's global strategy CN Rail Job satisfaction Global experience online shopping Doug Nix freight payment freight audit General Motors CP Rail TMS freight rate increases Online grocery shopping Twitter Digitization Climate Change Associates Tracy Matura freight bid TransForce Harper Davos speech UP Trucker Protest Surety bond Dedicated Trucking Derek Singleton Business skills Freight contracts Sales Training Freight Rates Packaging customer engagement freight costs University of Tennessee Life Lessons Canadian economy Toronto Maple Leafs Retail autonomous vehicles Canada last mile delivery broker bonds Rotman School of Business shipping wine Social Media in Transportation TMP Worldwide Montreal Canadiens Finance and Transportation US Election IANA robotics Transportation laptop Wal-Mart 2014 freight forecast Career Advice computer truck capacity New York Times Werner Canadian Transportation & Logistics NCC Hockey Blogging freight marketplace Load broker Dan Goodwill LCV's ProMiles ELD Infrastructure Dedicated Contract Carriage hiring process FuelQuest Retail transportation Tariffs financial management Trucking transportation newspaper derailments NS Value Proposition Deferred Packaging CSA scores coaching 2015 Economic Forecast intermodal Inbound Transportation rail safety Sales Management President Obama future of freight industry Blockchain Politics China 3PLTL

Blog Archives

March
February
December
October
September
August
June
May
April
March
January