Follow us on Twitter!
Blog Header Logo
DG&A's Transportation Consulting Blog
Posted by on in General
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 27484
  • 1 Comment
  • Print

The 2012 “Masters in Logistics” Study highlights how Larger Shippers are using Transportation Strategy as a Competitive Weapon

For over two decades the University of Tennessee has been conducting its Masters in Logistics research study.  This year the study was undertaken in partnership with Con-way Inc., Ernst & Young, and Logistics Management.  The U.S. based participants accounted for an estimated $30.1 billion in domestic transportation expenditures and over $20.5 billion in international transportation.  Some 1,370 domestic and global logistics, transportation, and supply chain management professionals participated in the study.  A summary of the report appears in the current issue of Logistics Management and is the basis of this blog.

The Masters of Logistics, those companies with annual freight spend in excess of $3 billion, represented 27.8 percent of the study participants. Medium-sized firms, with between $500 million and $3 billion in annual revenue, were 20.6 percent of respondents. The majority of respondents (51.6 percent) were smaller firms with reported annual revenue less than $500 million.  The study participants came from a broad array of industries.

 The results identify the emergence of an idea advocated for over a decade, and one which is being put into place by the Masters of Logistics: Use logistics and transportation services to differentiate yourself in the marketplace. As the study suggests, being able to deliver differentiated service is not possible without a value-creating partnership between the shipper and its strategic carriers; in turn, this has created a unique balance of power between the two parties.

Overall transportation spending as a percent of sales increased from 2011 to 2012. The data showed that companies that spent more than 5 percent of sales on domestic transportation increased year-over-year, rising from 21.2 percent to 26.7 percent in 2012.  The key reason is the change in strategic direction for many companies. Following several years of intense cost cutting, particularly in transportation spending, the 2012 study results point towards companies shifting some of their focus to maximizing profitability and asset utilization. In the meantime, the percentage of respondents who reported that their primary objective is reducing costs has shrunk each of the past three years—findings that reveal that shippers again believe that you have to “spend money to make money”.

Being able to rapidly respond to changing customer requirements is becoming increasingly critical for both shippers and carriers. Today, more than ever, transportation plays a key role in helping companies attain that necessary level of responsiveness. The study indicates that some 71.6 percent of respondents are either capable or highly capable of adjusting transportation operations in response to changing conditions—and this ability to alter and adapt is greater for transportation than for logistics operations.  ‘Total Delivered Cost” is becoming the value creation metric and competitive differentiator among carriers.

The need to create more value is reflected in how shippers are utilizing the various modal combinations.  Truckload transportation still accounts for the largest share of the transportation budget. In addition to being highly responsive to changing conditions, it enables companies to address concerns about fuel costs that ultimately impact the cost to serve and the total landed cost. LTL accounted for 17.3 percent of the transportation budget in 2012, representing the second largest modal expenditure for firms.  However, this is a decline of 2.7 percentage points from 2011. The decline in LTL was the largest change reported for any of the modes for 2012. The study found that part of this decline in spending was used to boost the budget for private fleet. After a slight dip in the percent of the transportation budget in 2011, the expenditures for private fleets are almost on par with the 2010 level. Rail’s portion of the transportation budget remained essentially the same year-over-year while intermodal increased in 2012 accounting for 4.3 percent of total spend.

In the current shipping environment where supply and demand are in fairly close balance, there is a requirement to have a capacity strategy.  Tommy Barnes, president of Con-way Multimodal mentioned that “companies, both shippers and carriers, are looking for a way to use the right capacity in the right geographical places. Using a multimodal strategy can fill that gap.”

Shippers are taking five actions to improve transportation efficiency.

  • Shipment consolidation
  • Core (strategic) carriers
  • “Spot” bidding for freight
  • Route planning
  • Carrier tracking

 Of the five, the study suggests that the most promising one is the use of core or strategic carriers. To be successful, both shippers and carriers must be fully committed to the relationship. The efficiency initiatives suggest that shippers are making use of multiple methods to keep transportation costs in check. “Logistics and transportation efficiencies will help create a competitive advantage for small- and large-sized shippers,” says Barnes. “The efficiencies can drive logistics and transportation productivity and eliminate risk, thus allowing organizations to focus on customer/supplier value.”

Many factors have caused shippers to change the way they manage logistics and supply chain activities. The main influences according to the results from this year’s study are: 

• ability to respond to changing customer requirements;

• energy (fuel) prices;

• cost to serve (specifically distribution);

• inventory reduction;

• and total landed costs.

The results of this year’s study suggest that the nature of the relationship between carriers and shippers has fundamentally shifted.  Study participants are in strong agreement that being better than their competitors in terms of service would significantly improve their competitive position. There is also an awareness that while logistics and transportation service will differentiate them in the marketplace, it does not allow them to charge customers a premium price—hence the need for carriers and shippers to work together to create the former without incurring the latter.

The study results show an emerging trend by the Masters of Logistics to set themselves apart from their competitors through differentiated service. Transportation plays a critical role in enabling the firm to deliver differentiated service of which a prominent feature is being able to respond to changing conditions. As such, it positions transportation as a vital part of value creation.  For more on the study, pick up the latest issue of Logistics Management

0

Comments

  • Guest
    Barbara Moori Friday, 09 November 2012

    Truck Factoring

    Very informative post on transportation market, their budget and their supply and demand. Shipper to manage their transport have to mainly focus on customer needs.

Leave your comment

Guest Thursday, 25 April 2024

Most Recent Posts

Search


Tag Cloud

Load Boards carrier conference ProMiles last mile delivery cheap oil shipping wine Value Proposition Infrastructure Life Lessons China freight payment freight audit shipper-carrier roundtable Habs TransForce Carriers cars Canada U.S. trade Search engine optimization Load broker Canadian Protests USA Truck Global experience capacity shortage energy efficiency Electric Vehicles MBA Driving for Profit Comey automation Whole Foods RFP Uber Freight peak season Toronto Maple Leafs ELD driver shortages driverless freight payment home delivery Donald Trump Anti-Vax tanker cars FuelQuest Hockey Digitization freight transportation Sales Strategy Masters in Logistics Rail Freight Rates Software Advice Transplace Consulting Sales Training Packaging Emergent Strategy 2012 Transportation Business Strategies. Jugaad CP Rail Right Shoring Ferromex Doug Nix cyber security autos Success business start-up freight transportation conference Canada-U.S. trade agreement YRC 2013 Economic Forecast driver BNSF dimensional pricing natural disasters economy APL Derek Singleton Canadian truckers Training Global Transportation Hub CN Distribution Climate Change LinkedIn solutions provider YRCW Trucker Protest Career Advice LCV's trade Horizontal Supply Chain Collaboration University of Tennessee Dedicated Contract Carriage Education CSA the future of transportation capacity shortages Crisis management shipper-carrier collaboration bulk shipping President Obama transportation audit 2014 freight forecast selling trucking companies Transportation service Railway Association of Canada Transportation economic outlook marketing Stephen Harper Trade Vision Broker Freight Shuttle System Dan Goodwill Online grocery shopping USMCA financial management trucking company acquisitions Trucking Driver Shortage Crude Oil by Rail Social Media in Transportation small business Amazon BlueGrace Logistics truck drivers truck driver Swift Transcom Fleet Leasing Tariffs dynamic pricing Rotman School of Business Celadon Freight Matching 2014 economic forecast Montreal Canadiens New York Times CN Rail IANA US Manufacturing Freight Carriers Association of Canada EBOR 3PLTL fuel surcharge 3PL Schneider Logistics Retail transportation Canada's global strategy Accessorial Charges UP Dedicated Trucking pipelines Rate per Mile Canadian freight market ShipMax CSA scores Transportation Buying Trends Survey broker bonds economic forecasts for 2012 Freight Recession Harper Davos speech Inbound Transportation Warehousing Blogging recession online shopping transportation news Canadian economy Facebook autonomous vehicles Transloading routing guide Canada Entrepreneur Social Media Management 2015 Economic Forecast computer protection MPG David Tuttle CRM freight rate increases truck capacity freight audit Deferred Packaging Business Strategy freight forwarders computer security Business Development US Economy NMFC Map-21 Hudsons Bay Company CSX Training New Hires Trump Keystone Pipeline Associates Finance and Transportation FMS US Auto Sales risk management transportation newspaper Leafs Werner Sales Management consumer centric Truckload hiring process broker security Regina Wal-Mart Tracy Matura buying trucking companies Blockchain future of freight industry KCS e-commerce Coronavirus shipper-carrier contracts Job satisfaction Transport Capital Partners (TCP) freight agreements Freight Capacity FCA Yield Improvement Politics Doug Davis shipping drones FCPC home delibery Bobby Harris Loblaw Microsoft TMS freight bid 360ideaspace Freight Management Leadership freight broker business security Geopolitics network optimization professional drivers Freight contracts Otto Muhammad Ali dark stores driver pay $75000 bond US Election Conway mentoring intermodal Colilers International Reshoring freight costs General Motors Government Failure Outsourcing Sales freight marketplace US Housing Market Cleveland Cavaliers technology small parcel Adrian Gonzalez JB Hunt Canadian Transportation & Logistics derailments LTL NAFTA Grocery Success failure entrepreneur Surety bond customer engagement coaching CITA Shipper Pulse Survey Toronto Fire Phone freight RFP digital freight matching NS rail safety Impeachment Freight Business Transformation Strategy Scott Monty supply chain management Twitter Covid-19 robotics employee termination FMCSA computer Omni Channel Shipper NCC Justice 2014 freight volumes asset management laptop Business skills Sales freight transportation in 2011 Spanx freight cost savings TMP Worldwide Retail Digital Freight Networks

Blog Archives

April
March
February
December
October
September
August
June
May
April
March
January