Follow us on Twitter!
Blog Header Logo
DG&A's Transportation Consulting Blog
Posted by on in Freight Bids
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 2308
  • 0 Comments
  • Print

Get your “House in Order” Before Conducting a Freight Bid

 

b2ap3_thumbnail_dreamstime_xl_49290215.jpg

One of the most frequent complaints I hear from carriers, in person, on social media, or at conferences, is about the number and quality of freight bids that they receive. Carriers complain about the poor quality of the data, the number of carriers in the bid, and about the lack of professionalism in the bid process. They also assert that if the shipper would just meet with them face to face, rather than through a bid process, the result would be more successful for both parties and would take a lot less time, money and effort.

My company has designed and executed many successful bids over the past fourteen years. We have learned that for many shippers, success comes from getting “your house in order” before executing the bid. This is what is involved.

Many shippers have been moving the same freight, to the same consignees, using the same processes, for several years. In their haste to put their freight out for bid, they overlook certain aspects of their business.

A company's product portfolio evolves over time.  New products are introduced as old ones are retired. Miniaturization and packaging changes can have significant impacts on freight densities, and as a by-product, freight rates.  It is essential for shippers to obtain precise calculations of updated product densities before launching a bid exercise.

Businesses change over time. New divisions are added while others may be closed or sold. This may alter freight flows.  Some companies overlook the opportunity to merge their freight with their new sister or acquired divisions to improve their negotiating leverage. In other cases, new pool or consolidation points may evolve.

We sometimes find companies that experience a deterioration in their business volumes. Poor economic or competitive conditions may reduce shipping volumes and leverage. This can necessitate combining volumes with competitive shippers, forming industry associations or taking other creative approaches to make their freight more attractive to carriers.

Shippers should also look at their order fulfillment processes and cycle times. Some consignees may be able to provide more lead time on their orders if you ask them. This can allow for combining daily LTL orders into larger shipment sizes and moving them on designated days.

In other cases, intermodal transportation, in some areas, may be an effective option to over the road service, at a significant savings.  For certain Canadian-based companies, they may be able to arrange direct shipping of their products from their US vendors to their Canadian consignees, by-passing their Canadian warehouses in some instances, and reducing cross-docking, re-handling, and line haul costs.

It is critical to identify and implement these efficiencies before conducting a bid. These operational changes will translate into even bigger savings after the bid has been conducted. If necessary, delay the launch of the bid until these changes are made. Keep in mind that your carriers’ rates are tied to freight volumes on specific corridors. If you make these changes after the bid, you run the risk that the carriers will come back and ask for a renegotiation of the rates.

Shippers also need to get their data in order before conducting bid. It is essential that the carriers in the bid be supplied with accurate data upon which they can base their rates. The data should be cleansed to remove errors in weights; the volumes in certain lanes should be corrected to reflect new customers added during the year and the loss of some old ones.

Two other areas to look at are production and inventory management processes. For some shippers, these may be delicate issues to raise with their supply chain partners. Nevertheless, if there are problems with production processes such that the company is required to make excessive use of expedited services, or if cramped warehouses force the company to move suboptimal shipment sizes, these translate into higher than necessary freight costs. Again, these items should be addressed, if possible, before executing the bid.

By making ongoing changes to a company’s supply chain, this ensures that the business is operating as efficiently as possible. By combining these changes with a well organized FRP process, shippers can maximize their savings. For more information on how to conduct a professional freight bid, check out my series of blogs on this topic (http://www.dantranscon.com/index.php/blog/entry/freight-bid-tip-1-obtain-buy-in-and-participation-from-the-operating-divisions ).

 

To stay up to date on Best Practices in Freight Management, follow me on Twitter @DanGoodwill, join the Freight Management Best Practices group on LinkedIn and subscribe to Dan’s Transportation Newspaper (http://paper.li/DanGoodwill/1342211466).

0

Comments

  • No comments made yet. Be the first to submit a comment

Leave your comment

Guest Thursday, 25 April 2024

Most Recent Posts

Search


Tag Cloud

Hudsons Bay Company Crude Oil by Rail TMP Worldwide Transcom Fleet Leasing CRM Transportation Buying Trends Survey Harper Davos speech bulk shipping broker security Freight Shuttle System Montreal Canadiens small business Driver Shortage freight marketplace shipping wine freight costs CSA Keystone Pipeline Government University of Tennessee 3PL selling trucking companies NCC USMCA Retail transportation driver Politics digital freight matching Rate per Mile Fire Phone Dedicated Contract Carriage CN Rail 2015 Economic Forecast Blockchain the future of transportation MBA Railway Association of Canada intermodal Failure APL Crisis management Wal-Mart Finance and Transportation shipper-carrier collaboration capacity shortage NMFC shipping pipelines computer protection Reshoring TMS Online grocery shopping cyber security Celadon Training New Hires Geopolitics NS Coronavirus Canadian freight market Transloading Trump Freight Rates Shipper trade capacity shortages Adrian Gonzalez home delibery dark stores Scott Monty Dan Goodwill Derek Singleton driver pay Regina YRCW Tracy Matura Whole Foods freight broker freight rate increases coaching ELD online shopping Tariffs freight agreements rail safety US Economy Muhammad Ali carrier conference Business skills freight forwarders Warehousing Conway Canada-U.S. trade agreement YRC Omni Channel Transportation President Obama Covid-19 Yield Improvement Grocery Doug Nix Electric Vehicles technology ShipMax David Tuttle Uber Freight truck driver 2013 Economic Forecast Freight Recession freight payment freight audit Canadian Transportation & Logistics Broker Global Transportation Hub Trucking Twitter routing guide Werner New York Times Value Proposition FCPC Digitization Social Media Consulting future of freight industry economic outlook Transportation service driver shortages RFP Rail $75000 bond Life Lessons General Motors Loblaw Toronto network optimization Transport Capital Partners (TCP) fuel surcharge truck capacity Freight Leafs Blogging Anti-Vax computer Entrepreneur small parcel Load broker transportation audit CP Rail JB Hunt autos Swift Hockey employee termination economic forecasts for 2012 Training transportation news Ferromex China cheap oil Retail Truckload 3PLTL UP 2014 freight forecast business start-up Success failure entrepreneur Impeachment dimensional pricing Job satisfaction Distribution shipper-carrier roundtable drones Driving for Profit Microsoft Freight Capacity freight payment Canada U.S. trade Climate Change Associates Business Transformation Strategy shipper-carrier contracts Business Development autonomous vehicles Colilers International Load Boards freight transportation conference consumer centric Donald Trump Schneider Logistics CSX energy efficiency Sales Management Sales Strategy Surety bond Rotman School of Business Masters in Logistics Cleveland Cavaliers Accessorial Charges home delivery Toronto Maple Leafs Packaging Outsourcing Sales US Auto Sales Education risk management Trucker Protest US Election e-commerce broker bonds Canadian Protests Stephen Harper Trade Vision marketing FMCSA Sales Success LTL BNSF Freight contracts Right Shoring Canadian truckers BlueGrace Logistics freight transportation in 2011 Career Advice computer security Otto TransForce cars supply chain management derailments CN IANA recession robotics Infrastructure Management ProMiles Canada Transplace transportation newspaper Spanx NAFTA US Housing Market Justice 2014 economic forecast 360ideaspace financial management 2012 Transportation Business Strategies. Jugaad KCS Sales Training Carriers CSA scores Canada's global strategy business security customer engagement freight bid Freight Carriers Association of Canada hiring process professional drivers Emergent Strategy Deferred Packaging economy Freight Matching FCA dynamic pricing FuelQuest automation Leadership freight transportation freight cost savings USA Truck trucking company acquisitions Amazon Habs solutions provider asset management CITA Shipper Pulse Survey Canadian economy Map-21 Business Strategy laptop Inbound Transportation Social Media in Transportation Bobby Harris mentoring Horizontal Supply Chain Collaboration buying trucking companies last mile delivery EBOR peak season MPG FMS Doug Davis LCV's Global experience Digital Freight Networks tanker cars Comey natural disasters Dedicated Trucking Software Advice freight RFP Freight Management LinkedIn truck drivers Search engine optimization freight audit 2014 freight volumes driverless Facebook US Manufacturing

Blog Archives

April
March
February
December
October
September
August
June
May
April
March
January