Follow us on Twitter!
Blog Header Logo
DG&A's Transportation Consulting Blog
Posted by on in Shipper-Carrier Collaboration
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 6720
  • 0 Comments
  • Print

Does your Company Need a Motor Carrier Agreement to Manage its Freight Transportation?

 

b2ap3_thumbnail_dreamstime_xl_64569399.jpg

Motor carrier agreements or contracts are documents signed between shippers and carriers that set out the parameters and processes under which two or more companies work together to provide freight transportation services. These documents, often prepared by lawyers (with input from freight management professionals), set out a range of service expectations and freight rates that define the relationship between the parties. While freight agreements have come into widespread use, the question is if and when these documents are necessary?

One could argue that if two or more parties are operating in good faith, do they need a legal document to circumscribe the nature of their relationship? If shippers and carriers are supposed to work together as partners in an open and trusting manner, does a formal, written agreement get in the way of a business partnership arrangement? Does it inhibit open and honest communication?

Do motor carrier agreements create a rigid framework that reduces flexibility? Are they detrimental to the sometime unpredictable and fluid nature of freight transportation? Does a formal agreement make it more difficult for a shipper to obtain additional equipment or after hour’s service? Do they place carriers with a limited set of equipment into a straight-jacket? Does the fear of punishment or service failure force a carrier to provide equipment and service to one client (that has a contract) at the expense of another client (that doesn’t have one)?

Some of these issues are valid concerns. The freight business is fast-moving. Shippers and carriers need to work together in a trusting relationship and adapt quickly and effectively to changing situations.

Freight agreements are not universally necessary for every shipper-carrier relationship. For companies with a small freight spend (less than $2 million on an annual basis), contracts are probably unnecessary unless all of the freight moves with one mode (i.e. small parcel) and with one carrier. For shippers who work in markets where there are limited choices, contracts are likely of limited value. Similarly, for shippers with multi-million dollar freight expenditures, there are likely niche carriers that service certain remote or hard to reach markets. On an annual basis, these costs may be less than $500,000 per year. There is likely no need for freight agreements to manage these carriers. In these instances, a rate agreement and transit schedule will likely suffice.

However, for shippers who spend 5, 10 or 50 million dollars (or more) on freight transportation, carrier contracts can be very beneficial. Here is the rationale.

A good motor carrier agreement addresses a range of important items. A well written contract will specify the types of licenses and permits that the motor carrier must have to perform work for the shipper. It lays out the quality of equipment and drivers that the carrier must employ to transport the shipper’s freight. It also details the services to be performed and how performance will be measured. It goes on to describe the “progressive discipline” process that will be in place, including timelines for corrective action, to ensure acceptable levels of performance are maintained over time. The agreement outlines the level of insurance required to protect the goods of the shipper and describes the process for damage or loss claims. It includes the rates and surcharges to be applied and the formula for rate increases in subsequent years. The transit schedule is usually attached as an addendum.

In other words, a good motor carrier agreement takes away a level of risk and uncertainty that can exist for both parties. It provides a detailed blueprint of all of the key elements of a successful shipper- carrier relationship over a multi-year period. Rather than restricting the nature of the relationship, a good agreement promotes a long term partnership. Check out the next blog where the components of a comprehensive, quality agreement are outlined in detail.

 

To stay up to date on Best Practices in Freight Management, follow me on Twitter @DanGoodwill, join the Freight Management Best Practices group on and subscribe to Dan’s Transportation Newspaper (http://paper.li/DanGoodwill/1342211466).

0

Comments

  • No comments made yet. Be the first to submit a comment

Leave your comment

Guest Friday, 29 March 2024

Most Recent Posts

Search


Tag Cloud

ELD Retail transportation intermodal Facebook dark stores Geopolitics trade driver pay fuel surcharge Tracy Matura Wal-Mart Deferred Packaging USMCA ShipMax Fire Phone Transcom Fleet Leasing coaching TMS Ferromex Global Transportation Hub Toronto Reshoring Driving for Profit Dedicated Trucking APL Uber Freight economic forecasts for 2012 Sales Blogging Colilers International Business skills BNSF US Housing Market Freight contracts Justice the future of transportation Crisis management natural disasters 3PLTL Hockey Impeachment freight forwarders dimensional pricing truck capacity Inbound Transportation New York Times Digitization Online grocery shopping Business Transformation Strategy driverless Conway Derek Singleton Amazon $75000 bond LinkedIn risk management FMCSA Freight Carriers Association of Canada truck drivers 2014 freight forecast routing guide shipping wine ProMiles freight agreements Hudsons Bay Company Toronto Maple Leafs Canadian Transportation & Logistics Canadian Protests home delivery Emergent Strategy solutions provider YRCW Transportation service Associates Map-21 Job satisfaction Shipper Freight Matching Scott Monty Regina computer protection Bobby Harris Transport Capital Partners (TCP) truck driver Microsoft JB Hunt trucking company acquisitions business start-up digital freight matching CP Rail Load broker Freight rail safety Loblaw cars Keystone Pipeline USA Truck Failure Anti-Vax computer broker security NAFTA CITA Shipper Pulse Survey future of freight industry buying trucking companies freight payment freight audit marketing Transportation Packaging Werner Life Lessons Canada-U.S. trade agreement YRC Rotman School of Business 2014 freight volumes 2014 economic forecast Social Media Distribution autonomous vehicles Otto Doug Nix MPG Omni Channel shipper-carrier contracts peak season employee termination transportation newspaper CRM Freight Management Warehousing Broker technology Training Search engine optimization Sales Management Canada's global strategy broker bonds small business Railway Association of Canada Management home delibery Canadian freight market freight cost savings NCC UP Twitter Transloading Truckload Business Strategy e-commerce asset management LTL Stephen Harper Trade Vision Montreal Canadiens TransForce business security tanker cars laptop Right Shoring Surety bond Politics 2012 Transportation Business Strategies. Jugaad Whole Foods Global experience Freight Rates FMS Canada pipelines NS autos economy US Economy transportation audit capacity shortage customer engagement freight broker Infrastructure EBOR Retail Digital Freight Networks Blockchain Leadership Software Advice Trucking Value Proposition freight rate increases Success CN Rail Swift shipper-carrier roundtable Canadian truckers cyber security freight transportation in 2011 Sales Training driver shortages Load Boards Carriers consumer centric Education Spanx shipper-carrier collaboration US Election financial management TMP Worldwide Government bulk shipping US Manufacturing Masters in Logistics freight costs freight payment Grocery carrier conference Cleveland Cavaliers NMFC FCA Consulting Climate Change Dan Goodwill 360ideaspace RFP Driver Shortage Rate per Mile Crude Oil by Rail 2015 Economic Forecast freight marketplace Rail Covid-19 selling trucking companies CSA driver Transplace freight transportation IANA Career Advice Freight Recession Celadon cheap oil automation freight bid David Tuttle Entrepreneur Yield Improvement drones Outsourcing Sales Freight Shuttle System KCS Canadian economy Leafs Electric Vehicles Success failure entrepreneur Tariffs FCPC President Obama economic outlook network optimization MBA 3PL transportation news Doug Davis CSA scores Accessorial Charges small parcel last mile delivery robotics Harper Davos speech Dedicated Contract Carriage CSX online shopping Business Development supply chain management Trucker Protest FuelQuest Sales Strategy Donald Trump hiring process General Motors Horizontal Supply Chain Collaboration Finance and Transportation freight RFP freight transportation conference computer security Schneider Logistics derailments LCV's Muhammad Ali professional drivers Canada U.S. trade CN capacity shortages Comey 2013 Economic Forecast recession Coronavirus Social Media in Transportation China University of Tennessee energy efficiency dynamic pricing Trump Transportation Buying Trends Survey freight audit US Auto Sales Adrian Gonzalez BlueGrace Logistics Habs mentoring Training New Hires shipping Freight Capacity

Blog Archives

March
February
December
October
September
August
June
May
April
March
January