Follow us on Twitter!
Blog Header Logo
DG&A's Transportation Consulting Blog
Posted by on in Freight Bids
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 2305
  • 0 Comments
  • Print

Get your “House in Order” Before Conducting a Freight Bid

 

b2ap3_thumbnail_dreamstime_xl_49290215.jpg

One of the most frequent complaints I hear from carriers, in person, on social media, or at conferences, is about the number and quality of freight bids that they receive. Carriers complain about the poor quality of the data, the number of carriers in the bid, and about the lack of professionalism in the bid process. They also assert that if the shipper would just meet with them face to face, rather than through a bid process, the result would be more successful for both parties and would take a lot less time, money and effort.

My company has designed and executed many successful bids over the past fourteen years. We have learned that for many shippers, success comes from getting “your house in order” before executing the bid. This is what is involved.

Many shippers have been moving the same freight, to the same consignees, using the same processes, for several years. In their haste to put their freight out for bid, they overlook certain aspects of their business.

A company's product portfolio evolves over time.  New products are introduced as old ones are retired. Miniaturization and packaging changes can have significant impacts on freight densities, and as a by-product, freight rates.  It is essential for shippers to obtain precise calculations of updated product densities before launching a bid exercise.

Businesses change over time. New divisions are added while others may be closed or sold. This may alter freight flows.  Some companies overlook the opportunity to merge their freight with their new sister or acquired divisions to improve their negotiating leverage. In other cases, new pool or consolidation points may evolve.

We sometimes find companies that experience a deterioration in their business volumes. Poor economic or competitive conditions may reduce shipping volumes and leverage. This can necessitate combining volumes with competitive shippers, forming industry associations or taking other creative approaches to make their freight more attractive to carriers.

Shippers should also look at their order fulfillment processes and cycle times. Some consignees may be able to provide more lead time on their orders if you ask them. This can allow for combining daily LTL orders into larger shipment sizes and moving them on designated days.

In other cases, intermodal transportation, in some areas, may be an effective option to over the road service, at a significant savings.  For certain Canadian-based companies, they may be able to arrange direct shipping of their products from their US vendors to their Canadian consignees, by-passing their Canadian warehouses in some instances, and reducing cross-docking, re-handling, and line haul costs.

It is critical to identify and implement these efficiencies before conducting a bid. These operational changes will translate into even bigger savings after the bid has been conducted. If necessary, delay the launch of the bid until these changes are made. Keep in mind that your carriers’ rates are tied to freight volumes on specific corridors. If you make these changes after the bid, you run the risk that the carriers will come back and ask for a renegotiation of the rates.

Shippers also need to get their data in order before conducting bid. It is essential that the carriers in the bid be supplied with accurate data upon which they can base their rates. The data should be cleansed to remove errors in weights; the volumes in certain lanes should be corrected to reflect new customers added during the year and the loss of some old ones.

Two other areas to look at are production and inventory management processes. For some shippers, these may be delicate issues to raise with their supply chain partners. Nevertheless, if there are problems with production processes such that the company is required to make excessive use of expedited services, or if cramped warehouses force the company to move suboptimal shipment sizes, these translate into higher than necessary freight costs. Again, these items should be addressed, if possible, before executing the bid.

By making ongoing changes to a company’s supply chain, this ensures that the business is operating as efficiently as possible. By combining these changes with a well organized FRP process, shippers can maximize their savings. For more information on how to conduct a professional freight bid, check out my series of blogs on this topic (http://www.dantranscon.com/index.php/blog/entry/freight-bid-tip-1-obtain-buy-in-and-participation-from-the-operating-divisions ).

 

To stay up to date on Best Practices in Freight Management, follow me on Twitter @DanGoodwill, join the Freight Management Best Practices group on LinkedIn and subscribe to Dan’s Transportation Newspaper (http://paper.li/DanGoodwill/1342211466).

0

Comments

  • No comments made yet. Be the first to submit a comment

Leave your comment

Guest Thursday, 18 April 2024

Most Recent Posts

Search


Tag Cloud

Omni Channel Canadian freight market Load Boards Transportation service Yield Improvement Sales Management truck driver Transplace IANA Life Lessons Toronto Maple Leafs carrier conference Rate per Mile Training New Hires computer home delivery drones Blogging Habs Uber Freight Blockchain hiring process peak season home delibery President Obama Driver Shortage freight transportation Wal-Mart dynamic pricing Social Media in Transportation US Election Surety bond US Manufacturing network optimization business security dimensional pricing Sales Strategy NS Crisis management shipper-carrier contracts laptop LCV's Carriers Accessorial Charges Transportation Buying Trends Survey Outsourcing Sales supply chain management Regina Global Transportation Hub shipping wine Canadian Protests Business Development Business Transformation Strategy Hockey Dedicated Contract Carriage TMP Worldwide Retail broker security freight cost savings automation Broker Warehousing Distribution customer engagement TMS Otto New York Times BlueGrace Logistics Deferred Packaging 2015 Economic Forecast autonomous vehicles NCC Politics Business skills coaching Railway Association of Canada $75000 bond Horizontal Supply Chain Collaboration intermodal NAFTA cheap oil digital freight matching small parcel driver shortages asset management Software Advice Swift Canada's global strategy Grocery freight transportation in 2011 cyber security Associates freight agreements buying trucking companies Canadian Transportation & Logistics freight broker University of Tennessee Freight contracts financial management Bobby Harris Sales Training UP CSX Justice freight rate increases CSA scores routing guide Derek Singleton derailments Stephen Harper Trade Vision Transcom Fleet Leasing Shipper future of freight industry Covid-19 CITA Shipper Pulse Survey dark stores consumer centric Scott Monty Finance and Transportation risk management YRCW Packaging CRM freight bid driver pay freight payment Freight Recession CN marketing Spanx Tracy Matura energy efficiency Consulting Reshoring computer security Masters in Logistics recession capacity shortage Comey shipping Digital Freight Networks the future of transportation Conway capacity shortages Right Shoring US Housing Market Load broker General Motors Anti-Vax 2013 Economic Forecast freight forwarders Montreal Canadiens shipper-carrier collaboration 3PLTL FMS Transportation Celadon USA Truck Map-21 Freight Shuttle System USMCA CN Rail bulk shipping trade Canada U.S. trade Canadian truckers Dedicated Trucking truck capacity freight RFP Transport Capital Partners (TCP) 3PL Ferromex Digitization Harper Davos speech Trucking Freight Management online shopping Microsoft Career Advice Adrian Gonzalez Online grocery shopping Dan Goodwill ProMiles Entrepreneur freight costs Business Strategy broker bonds Sales Job satisfaction 360ideaspace Werner transportation newspaper Transloading Hudsons Bay Company autos Freight Carriers Association of Canada Keystone Pipeline US Auto Sales Muhammad Ali Electric Vehicles Canadian economy freight payment freight audit computer protection Freight Matching Canada Freight Rates Tariffs Climate Change rail safety driverless business start-up CSA solutions provider Fire Phone Failure Driving for Profit economy Truckload MPG economic outlook freight transportation conference Emergent Strategy Government employee termination Amazon FuelQuest Rail Global experience trucking company acquisitions professional drivers Coronavirus LinkedIn Impeachment EBOR Freight selling trucking companies NMFC Geopolitics Loblaw pipelines transportation news Whole Foods FCA 2012 Transportation Business Strategies. Jugaad Management Success TransForce David Tuttle Twitter robotics Training small business ELD Crude Oil by Rail freight marketplace FCPC e-commerce RFP Social Media Infrastructure Success failure entrepreneur Education 2014 freight volumes Facebook Toronto truck drivers natural disasters CP Rail Rotman School of Business ShipMax Leafs 2014 economic forecast transportation audit Value Proposition technology Trump China Schneider Logistics cars last mile delivery Colilers International Retail transportation Inbound Transportation shipper-carrier roundtable mentoring MBA Freight Capacity Donald Trump freight audit fuel surcharge KCS FMCSA Leadership driver Trucker Protest BNSF Doug Nix tanker cars Doug Davis Cleveland Cavaliers Canada-U.S. trade agreement YRC APL LTL US Economy JB Hunt 2014 freight forecast economic forecasts for 2012 Search engine optimization

Blog Archives

April
March
February
December
October
September
August
June
May
April
March
January